Vogue bags blog for Nice Prada—pradajoin.com

Obviously, these experts view is not supported by scientific evidence, but merely a “theory of speculation.” In fact, the success of university research also measured the backyard environment, soil dioxin levels, the results are not high. In other words, those eggs in the two British soil, the soil does not come from the culture environment.

Kung University, a pioneer study of such problems is not. A few years ago, Europe had a number of similar studies carried out. In 2006, the Dutch scholar published an overview of these studies. They concluded that the Netherlands and other EU countries “organic eggs” in dioxin levels, significantly higher than the “cage eggs”, including a large part of the even higher than allowed by EU safety standards. The EU has a perfect “organic products” management system, from the kind of “organic farm” of the egg dioxin levels higher than cage eggs, it is difficult to use the “backyard is not so good” to explain. So far, scientists have yet to find the exact reason, but according to available evidence, the activities in the wild chickens eat insects, earthworms such food should be an important factor.
Putting aside the reasons, the results should be carefully considered. China’s market, “earth egg”, rearing environment, will certainly better than Europe’s “organic farm” Why? Though the United Kingdom was one of many factors in food safety, which are brought to our problem is: there is no scientific evidence in the case, we “believe,” “safety” of reliable it?